Teams

Lovelady

2024 · 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Martinez / Darlene Powell vs Theresa Jones / Kari Martin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-12Won 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Martinez / Darlene Powell vs Liz Forberger / Theresa Jones6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnn Carroll / Eileen Long vs Kari Martin / Suzi Thorne6-3, 6-4
2024-11-05vs StokesWon 10
W#3 DoublesHolly Williams / Janet Lawrence vs DeAnn Rauth / Sherri Davis6-4, 6-3
2024-10-29Won 20
W#2 DoublesEileen Long / Ann Carroll vs Catrina Mashburn / Liz Forberger7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKay Henderson / Darlene Powell vs Julie Stokes / Suzi Thorne6-1, 6-1
2024-10-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesJanet Lawrence / Kay Henderson vs Julie Stokes / Suzi Thorne6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Connie Corbin
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.99
Eileen Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Carol Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Kay Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Janet Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Darlene Powell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Ann Carroll
published 3
2.48
Janet Lovelady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pushpa Bhatter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tiffany Laird
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Corbin + Kay Henderson6159% games+7.8% vs expected
Darlene Powell + Carol Martinez4163% gamesnot enough data
Janet Lovelady + Kay Henderson2339% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Laird + Connie Corbin5072% gamesnot enough data
Janet Lawrence + Eileen Long303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Corbin
38W–15L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Eileen Long
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Carol Martinez
55W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Kay Henderson
49W–40L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Janet Lawrence
22W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Darlene Powell
12W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Janet Lovelady
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Pushpa Bhatter
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Laird
25W–13L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.