Teams

1LIB-Briceno 35 MEN SINGLES F2

2025 cSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

13 players · average NTRP 3.64 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-05vs 2LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F2Split 11
W#2 SinglesRicardo de Majo vs Michael Chaize6-4, 6-5
L#3 SinglesJose Briceno vs Lonnie Shea3-6, 3-3
2025-11-22vs 4HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F2Won 21
L#1 SinglesDorran Dihle vs Joshua Postel3-6, 6-6
W#2 SinglesMark Kanpurwala vs Mikel Llanes6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJose Briceno vs Jeremy Carroll6-3, 4-3
2025-11-15vs 3CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F2Lost 02
L#1 SinglesSeth Kornfeld vs Chao Huang2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesIan Jones vs Chris Standley1-6, 2-6
2025-11-07vs 2LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F2Lost 12
L#1 SinglesSeth Kornfeld vs Luis Salas2-6, 5-6
W#2 SinglesRahul Bhatnagar vs Brian Loh6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMohan Dutt vs Michael Chaize3-6, 1-6
2025-10-31vs 4HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F2Won 21
W#1 SinglesEvans Boeve vs Joshua Postel6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesIan Jones vs Mikel Llanes6-7, 2-2
W#3 SinglesDavid Sitz vs Keith Meisel6-3, 6-2
2025-10-26vs 3CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F2Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEthan Postma vs Ben Torralva6-7, 1-2
2025-10-18vs 2LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F2Split 11
L#1 SinglesSeth Kornfeld vs Jeremy Somers2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEvans Boeve vs Nolan Orfield7-5, 6-3
2025-10-11vs 4HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F2Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDavid Sitz vs Gideon Rothschild2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJose Briceno vs Mikel Llanes6-0, 6-6
L#3 SinglesSeth Kornfeld vs Jeremy Carroll0-6, 4-6
2025-10-03vs 3CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F2Split 11
L#1 SinglesFrank Manley vs Victor Nambo4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesRicardo de Majo vs Travis Williams6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11LT-Arima 35 MEN SINGLES F18121612142
22WESS-Berry 35 MEN SINGLES F372171020209
34BEV-Reinker 35 MEN SINGLES F363171021172
42LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F263161122199
52PEACH-Niewoit 35 MEN SINGLES F163161125194
61LIB-Briceno 35 MEN SINGLES F254131427233
74HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F245131426227
85FAC-Crouson 35 MEN SINGLES F345111631232
91LT-Sanchez 35 MEN SINGLES F3329616119
106BT-Chukkapalli 35 MEN SINGLES F336121530239
113CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F236121534240
123EAST-Granger 35 MEN SINGLES F13691837240
133SCWB-Gay 35 MEN SINGLES F32791836241
144EAST-Rosen 35 MEN SINGLES F10952243286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Dorran Dihle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Frank Manley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Mark Kanpurwala
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.55
Ricardo de Majo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Rahul Bhatnagar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
David Sitz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Yoshihiro Mochizuki
published 3.5
3.29
Evans Boeve
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.25
Ethan Postma
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.24
Mohan Dutt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Ian Jones
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.15
Jose Briceno
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.09
Seth Kornfeld
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Manley + Jose Briceno5066% gamesnot enough data
Seth Kornfeld + Jose Briceno2347% gamesnot enough data
Frank Manley + Seth Kornfeld224 matchesnot enough data
Seth Kornfeld + Mark Kanpurwala404 matchesnot enough data
Seth Kornfeld + Dorran Dihle314 matchesnot enough data
Dorran Dihle + Yoshihiro Mochizuki224 matchesnot enough data
Frank Manley + Mark Kanpurwala303 matchesnot enough data
Jose Briceno + Yoshihiro Mochizuki213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dorran Dihle
94W–65L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Frank Manley
100W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Mark Kanpurwala
116W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Ricardo de Majo
47W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Rahul Bhatnagar
109W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
David Sitz
90W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Yoshihiro Mochizuki
76W–72L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Evans Boeve
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Ethan Postma
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Mohan Dutt
19W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Ian Jones
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jose Briceno
70W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Seth Kornfeld
46W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.