Teams

4HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F2

2025 cSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-05vs 3CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F2Split 11
W#1 SinglesBradley Pavlik vs Max Wong6-2, 4-3
L#2 SinglesKamran Diba vs Victor Nambo6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-22vs 1LIB-Briceno 35 MEN SINGLES F2Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJoshua Postel vs Dorran Dihle6-3, 6-6
L#2 SinglesMikel Llanes vs Mark Kanpurwala3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJeremy Carroll vs Jose Briceno3-6, 3-4
2025-11-14vs 2LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F2Split 11
W#1 SinglesJoshua Postel vs Brian Loh6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRoman Giger vs Michael Chaize2-6
2025-11-09vs 3CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F2Won 30
W#1 SinglesBradley Pavlik vs Victor Nambo6-3, 5-4
W#2 SinglesJeremy Carroll vs Thamer Sartawi6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKamran Diba vs Ben Torralva6-3, 6-1
2025-10-31vs 1LIB-Briceno 35 MEN SINGLES F2Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJoshua Postel vs Evans Boeve3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMikel Llanes vs Ian Jones7-6, 2-2
L#3 SinglesKeith Meisel vs David Sitz3-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs 2LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F2Won 21
W#1 SinglesJoshua Postel vs Jeremy Somers6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKamran Diba vs Nolan Orfield5-7, 4-4
W#3 SinglesGideon Rothschild vs Michael Wynn6-0, 6-1
2025-10-18vs 3CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F2Won 21
W#1 SinglesJoshua Postel vs Chris Standley6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRoman Giger vs Thamer Sartawi6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDominick Zaccone vs Travis Williams3-6, 1-6
2025-10-11vs 1LIB-Briceno 35 MEN SINGLES F2Won 21
W#1 SinglesGideon Rothschild vs David Sitz6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMikel Llanes vs Jose Briceno0-6, 6-6
W#3 SinglesJeremy Carroll vs Seth Kornfeld6-0, 6-4
2025-10-04vs 2LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F2Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKeith Meisel vs Nolan Orfield1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKamran Diba vs Michael Chaize4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesDominick Zaccone vs Patrick Haley3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11LT-Arima 35 MEN SINGLES F18121612142
22WESS-Berry 35 MEN SINGLES F372171020209
34BEV-Reinker 35 MEN SINGLES F363171021172
42LIB-Wynn 35 MEN SINGLES F263161122199
52PEACH-Niewoit 35 MEN SINGLES F163161125194
61LIB-Briceno 35 MEN SINGLES F254131427233
74HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F245131426227
85FAC-Crouson 35 MEN SINGLES F345111631232
91LT-Sanchez 35 MEN SINGLES F3329616119
106BT-Chukkapalli 35 MEN SINGLES F336121530239
113CHIP-Nambo 35 MEN SINGLES F236121534240
123EAST-Granger 35 MEN SINGLES F13691837240
133SCWB-Gay 35 MEN SINGLES F32791836241
144EAST-Rosen 35 MEN SINGLES F10952243286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Bradley Pavlik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.66
Joshua Postel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Kamran Diba
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Gideon Rothschild
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Jeremy Carroll
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Keith Meisel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Dominick Zaccone
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Roman Giger
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Jeff Clark
published
Mikel Llanes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kamran Diba + Jeremy Carroll224 matchesnot enough data
Kamran Diba + Gideon Rothschild123 matchesnot enough data
Roman Giger + Dominick Zaccone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bradley Pavlik
90W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.73
3.5
Joshua Postel
30W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Kamran Diba
110W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Gideon Rothschild
43W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jeremy Carroll
40W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Keith Meisel
33W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dominick Zaccone
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Roman Giger
26W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Jeff Clark
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mikel Llanes
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.