Teams

YMCA PRESIDIO CW6.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 6.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Natalie Batlin
published
3.35
Elizabeth Lougee
published
3.24
Mary Anderson
published
3.23
Ashley Hellyer
published 3.5
3.19
Maria Alvarez
published
3.18
Joanna Brook
published
3.18
Emily Kitts
published
3.09
Robin Inaba
published
3.06
Molly Shiels
published
2.98
Sarah Howard
published
2.98
Megan Myers
published
2.95
Elizabeth Coryell
published
2.85
Melissa Mountain
published
2.84
Sonal Patel
published
2.82
Ashley Brasier
published 3
2.68
Bonnie Makovec
published 3
Eileen Bayer
published
Elizabeth Tasker
published
Feyna Oman
published
Jacqueline Maloney
published
Kristine Delagnes
published
Paula Romanovsky
published
Tricia Decker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Hellyer + Joanna Brook4838% games−0.8% vs expected
Sonal Patel + Robin Inaba134 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Batlin + Elizabeth Lougee044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Anderson + Ashley Brasier303 matchesnot enough data
Sonal Patel + Megan Myers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Elizabeth Lougee
23W–31L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Mary Anderson
25W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Ashley Hellyer
20W–32L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Maria Alvarez
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Joanna Brook
14W–23L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Emily Kitts
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
Robin Inaba
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
Molly Shiels
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Sarah Howard
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.98
Megan Myers
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Elizabeth Coryell
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Melissa Mountain
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Sonal Patel
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Ashley Brasier
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Bonnie Makovec
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Eileen Bayer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Tasker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Feyna Oman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jacqueline Maloney
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Delagnes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Romanovsky
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tricia Decker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.