Teams

MGoodrich (Carmel)

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-06vs JIson/DCazorla (BCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie O'Shea / Deborah Biggers vs Reshma Vora / Jami Stone4-6, 5-7
2024-07-24vs LHatfield (Palisades)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie O'Shea / Stephanie Parker vs Laura Hatfield / Debbie Wilson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-17vs NMcvicker (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKatie O'Shea / Stephanie Parker vs Meg Flanagan / Renee Foster3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-14vs JCrimin (BCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie O'Shea / Deborah Biggers vs Heather Barker / Rachel Miller5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-21vs LAndersen (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Biggers / Sara Porrata vs Christine Zetts / Erin Pacilli6-4, 6-3
2024-06-14vs JDaniel (Southampton)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKatie O'Shea / Sara Porrata vs Lisa O'Shea / Michelle Davis7-6, 6-0
2024-06-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Mermans / Kristine Wahr vs Angie Brogdon / Janet Derrington3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-31vs LHatfield (Palisades)Won 20
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Workman / Robin Mermans vs Lisa Gregoire / Cindy Harty6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Katie O'Shea vs Karen Davies / Laura Hatfield6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Megan Gilson
published
3.65
Robin Mermans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Catherine Bauer
published 3.5
3.36
Kristine Wahr
published
3.33
Katie O'Shea
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.30
Missy Goodrich
published
3.25
Sara Porrata
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Heidi Friedman
published
2.70
Deborah Biggers
published 3
Dorian Dipangrazio
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Gilson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.86
3.5
Robin Mermans
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Catherine Bauer
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
Kristine Wahr
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Katie O'Shea
100W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Missy Goodrich
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Sara Porrata
65W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Heidi Friedman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Deborah Biggers
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Dorian Dipangrazio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.