Teams

V - Set2Win

2021 USTA Adult 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Delaney / Ruth Wager vs Nancy Akkerman / Karen Kolosieke6-1, 6-2
2021-05-08vs V - Las Posas Got ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennie Costello / Ruth Wager vs Sharon Erickson / Gwen Speakes3-6, 1-6
2021-04-24vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesRuth Wager / Mary Snow vs Kate Centanni / Marie Smith0-6, 1-6
2021-04-11vs V - Royal AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Wager / Jennie Costello vs Geraldine Farrell / Sylvie Guerin6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Lisa Kapur
published 3.5
3.22
Jennie Costello
published
3.10
Anita Spraggs
published 3
3.10
Susan Delaney
published
3.09
Mary Snow
published
3.03
Ruth Wager
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Lisa Coleman
published
Wendy Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Wager + Lisa Kapur7357% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Wager + Susan Delaney3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Kapur
142W–64L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
Jennie Costello
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Anita Spraggs
72W–83L career · no lines in 2021
<1%21%79%
3.10
Susan Delaney
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Mary Snow
37W–34L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
Ruth Wager
62W–77L career · 4 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Lisa Coleman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69
Wendy Williams
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.