Teams

SCTA/Brooke Moore

2026 SCTA Spring '26 - Southern Combo 18 & Over · Women 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.64 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-24vs PTCTC/Victoria SerapigliaWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily John / Lauren Gleaton vs Gretchen Scheinost / Jill Cook3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesConnie Jones / Leah Taylor vs Jennifer Beseau / Barbara Lee6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLois Callahan / Chafree Conley vs Suzanne Perdue / Michelle Hannon6-3, 6-7, 6-4
2026-03-27vs PTCTC/Victoria SerapigliaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLorra Cotton / Brooke Moore vs Sara Ault / Erin Stoots3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCyndi Harkins / Emily John vs Mary Knight / Angela Goodwin0-6, 0-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Jones / Leah Taylor vs Barbara Lee / Jennifer Beseau6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PTCTC/Victoria Serapiglia5113515169
2SCTA/Brooke Moore5112619174
3PTCTC - Kicklighter/Cliche1561226185
4RCP - Townsend/Mynatt1551328202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Radka Jarrett
published
3.90
Chafree Conley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Jill Mitchell
published
3.83
Hope Grubbs
published
3.69
Karen Piester
published
3.69
Lorra Cotton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
3.65
Kylie Douglas
published
3.61
Brooke Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.60
Connie Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.60
Dawn Stiehl
published 3.5
3.57
Lauren Gleaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Angela Galusha
published 3.5
3.36
Lois Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Wendy Boone
published
3.12
Cyndi Harkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Leah Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Gleaton + Connie Jones12068% games+11.9% vs expected
Kylie Douglas + Radka Jarrett3451% games+10.9% vs expected
Lorra Cotton + Karen Piester19755% games+6.7% vs expected
Dawn Stiehl + Angela Galusha4451% games−1.6% vs expected
Brooke Moore + Lois Callahan7175% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Stiehl + Jill Mitchell314 matchesnot enough data
Chafree Conley + Radka Jarrett314 matchesnot enough data
Lorra Cotton + Wendy Boone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Radka Jarrett
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Chafree Conley
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Jill Mitchell
23W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Hope Grubbs
31W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Karen Piester
35W–18L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Lorra Cotton
41W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Cathy Hussard-Parnell
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Kylie Douglas
19W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.65
3.5
Brooke Moore
36W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Connie Jones
26W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Dawn Stiehl
53W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
Lauren Gleaton
48W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Angela Galusha
40W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
Lois Callahan
29W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Wendy Boone
48W–23L career · no lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.36
3.5
Cyndi Harkins
29W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Leah Taylor
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.