Teams

PTCTC/Victoria Serapiglia

2026 SCTA Spring '26 - Southern Combo 18 & Over · Women 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-24vs SCTA/Brooke MooreLost 12
W#1 DoublesGretchen Scheinost / Jill Cook vs Emily John / Lauren Gleaton3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Beseau / Barbara Lee vs Connie Jones / Leah Taylor3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Perdue / Michelle Hannon vs Lois Callahan / Chafree Conley3-6, 7-6, 4-6
2026-03-27vs SCTA/Brooke MooreWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Ault / Erin Stoots vs Lorra Cotton / Brooke Moore6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Knight / Angela Goodwin vs Cyndi Harkins / Emily John6-0, 2-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Lee / Jennifer Beseau vs Nancy Jones / Leah Taylor2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PTCTC/Victoria Serapiglia5113515169
2SCTA/Brooke Moore5112619174
3PTCTC - Kicklighter/Cliche1561226185
4RCP - Townsend/Mynatt1551328202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Sara Ault
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Meghan Kearney
published
3.92
Mary Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Kimberly Barlow
published
3.79
Barbara Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Suzanne Perdue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Gretchen Scheinost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Erin Stoots
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Janelle Bohan
published
3.50
Angela Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Victoria Serapiglia
published
3.45
Jill Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Jennifer Beseau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Michelle Hannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Kelly
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Ault + Meghan Kearney12065% games+9.0% vs expected
Barbara Lee + Gretchen Scheinost8359% games+1.6% vs expected
Jennifer Beseau + Barbara Lee3547% gamesnot enough data
Angela Goodwin + Janelle Bohan5065% gamesnot enough data
Jill Cook + Victoria Serapiglia3258% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Kearney + Barbara Lee314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Beseau + Meghan Kearney213 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Lee + Michelle Hannon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Ault
35W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%20%80%
4.12
Meghan Kearney
48W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Mary Knight
48W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Kimberly Barlow
13W–15L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.84
4
Barbara Lee
57W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Suzanne Perdue
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Gretchen Scheinost
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Erin Stoots
28W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
Janelle Bohan
52W–29L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Angela Goodwin
101W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Victoria Serapiglia
52W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Jill Cook
27W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Jennifer Beseau
34W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Michelle Hannon
47W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Barbara Kelly
25W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.