Teams

STSC-Moyer

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STSC-Moyer000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Fear
published 4
Connie Peters
published 4
3.74
Abby Swancutt
published 4
3.72
Debra VanHouten
published 4
3.67
3.60
Janet Lui-Hansen
published 4
3.32
Stephenie Tucker
published 3.5
3.26
Dana Richardson
published 3.5
Kaeanna Fredrickson
published
Kerry Moyer
published
Tiffera Tarbox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Wheeler + Debra VanHouten13657% games+6.3% vs expected
Kerry Moyer + Abby Swancutt161350% games−0.7% vs expected
Dana Richardson + Alejandra Clemens3450% games−3.6% vs expected
Debra VanHouten + Dana Richardson224 matchesnot enough data
Dana Richardson + Stephenie Tucker224 matchesnot enough data
Dana Richardson + Connie Peters134 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Wheeler + Janet Lui-Hansen123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Wheeler + Dana Richardson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandra Clemens
31W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Ashley Fear
29W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Connie Peters
53W–35L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Abby Swancutt
22W–19L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Debra VanHouten
42W–20L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Catherine Wheeler
67W–46L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Janet Lui-Hansen
42W–57L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Stephenie Tucker
94W–81L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dana Richardson
20W–53L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Kaeanna Fredrickson
31W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kerry Moyer
19W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tiffera Tarbox
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.