Teams

GREENBROOK RS 55AW8.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-08vs THE CLUB @LIVERMORE 55AW8.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Olla / Karen Wisser vs Sarah Carey / Danielle Duperly6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJane Gee / Lisa Ng vs Lisa Saporito / Nicole Cring7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathlyn Powers / Laura Rathkamp vs Julie Gundermann / Pensri Walsh1-6, 1-6
2025-04-06vs THE CLUB @LIVERMORE 55AW8.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Olla / Karen Wisser vs Sarah Carey / Donna Vis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Cummings / Lisa Ng vs Christine Harkness / Pensri Walsh6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJo Baker / Miho Bell vs Danielle Duperly / Allie Rodriguez6-3, 7-5
2025-04-03vs THE CLUB @LIVERMORE 55AW8.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Wisser / Amy Burrill vs Nora Hart / Danielle Duperly6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Cummings / Jane Gee vs Monya Lane / Christine Harkness7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Rathkamp / Kathlyn Powers vs Allie Rodriguez / Lisa Saporito2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Miho Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Jo Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Karen Wisser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Adrienne Cummings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Kathleen Olla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Amy Burrill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.00
Michelle Cooke
published
Jane Gee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathlyn Powers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Rathkamp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Ng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miho Bell
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
Jo Baker
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.78
Karen Wisser
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Adrienne Cummings
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Kathleen Olla
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Amy Burrill
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.41
Michelle Cooke
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Jane Gee
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathlyn Powers
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Rathkamp
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Ng
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.