Teams

Clarke/Knoxville

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.5,4.0,3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-10vs Douglas/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Clarke / Emily Elison vs MARISA GRAHAM / Sarah Ross2-6, 1-6
2023-02-03vs Duong18/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Heather Wilson vs Sheri Kilbey / Rita Thome2-6, 0-6
2023-01-27vs Houck/Knoxville/Tri18Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Allison King vs Gabriella Rimmer / Cindi Mooney6-2, 6-2
2023-01-21vs Douglas/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Allison King vs Erin Upshaw / HAILEY NEDS1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brooke Dill
published 4.5
4.13
Rachel Kimmel
published
4.12
Christina Kaak
published 4
3.98
Tara Hurley
published
3.88
Lauren Clarke
published
3.85
Kris Gompert
published
3.62
Stacey Bristow
published
3.56
Emily Elison
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.23
Jodie Campbell
published
3.20
Micki Martin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Dill
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Kimmel
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.13
4
Christina Kaak
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
4.12
Tara Hurley
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
Lauren Clarke
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Kris Gompert
25W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.85
Stacey Bristow
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Emily Elison
136W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jodie Campbell
33W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Micki Martin
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.