Teams

Heritage Bay - Beaudet

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-26vs GreyHawk - L. KranitesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTamara Blanco / Deborah Paller vs Dina Viteretti / Donna Curry7-5, 6-2
2021-05-19vs COLLIER - Quail Creek - J. BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesTamara Blanco / Susie Beaudet vs Kelly Stein / Eileen Valerio1-6, 2-6
2021-05-05vs Longshore Lake - MacWilliamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTamara Blanco / Aggie Rupert vs Marcia Erpenbeck / Rebecca Gutschow6-4, 6-4
2021-04-22vs Treviso Bay - PollockWon 10
W#1 DoublesAggie Rupert / Tamara Blanco vs Tina Jaquess / Victoria Pollock6-3, 6-2
2021-04-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTamara Blanco / Aggie Rupert vs Ashley Hayes / Linda Hayes3-6, 0-6
2021-04-07vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 01
L#1 DoublesAggie Rupert / Tamara Blanco vs Dana Sacks / Lisa Campbell4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kami Barnes
published
3.77
Aggie Rupert
published 4
3.50
Julie Lenhart
published
3.42
Krista Lombardo
published
3.35
Lucy Slaboch
published
3.35
Susie Beaudet
published
3.35
Jill Sanders
published
3.27
Deborah Paller
published 3.5
3.20
Suzi O'Connell
published
3.18
Tamara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Amaya
published
2.88
Mary Diegel
published
2.76
Andrea Kansy
published 3
Kimberly Rodriguez
published
MOLLY LANE
published
Terina Korda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Amaya + Krista Lombardo5075% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kami Barnes
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Aggie Rupert
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Julie Lenhart
11W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
Krista Lombardo
17W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
Lucy Slaboch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.35
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.35
Jill Sanders
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Deborah Paller
15W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Suzi O'Connell
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Tamara Blanco
42W–64L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Amaya
25W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%21%79%
3.11
Mary Diegel
12W–24L career · no lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Andrea Kansy
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
Kimberly Rodriguez
46W–28L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
MOLLY LANE
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terina Korda
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.