Teams

Treviso Bay - Pollock

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-05-26vs Verona Walk - LeeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly Taylor / Cheryl Rauch vs Jeanette Thevening / Susanna Haedelt6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTina Jaquess / Victoria Pollock vs Teri Williams / Cheryl Planck6-2, 6-4
2021-05-19vs Marco YMCA - BurschSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Eileen Komanecky vs Dana Bursch / Shirley Steffen6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Tina Jaquess vs Renee Facciola / Lisa Campbell6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-12vs Quail West - CorteseLost 02
L#1 DoublesFiona Prentice / Eileen Komanecky vs Colleen Bresson / Glara Yi-Powell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Tina Jaquess vs Christine Kriss / Mary Varilek2-6, 3-6
2021-05-05vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Eileen Komanecky vs Michelle Thomas / Claudia Hammon6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Tina Jaquess vs Linda Koenig / Cheryl Comes4-6, 2-6
2021-04-28vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Jaquess / Nancy Kriek vs Ashley Hayes / Kelly Heintzelman2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Reilly / Cheryl Rauch vs Linda Keely / Michelle Kaytaz7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-25vs COLLIER - Quail Creek - J. BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Eileen Komanecky vs Jennifer Brown / Gretchen Landolt5-7, 5-7
2021-04-22vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Jaquess / Victoria Pollock vs Aggie Rupert / Tamara Blanco3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Kerry Wells vs MOLLY LANE / Kimberly Rodriguez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-14vs GreyHawk - L. KranitesWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Kriek / Cheryl Rauch vs Dina Viteretti / Jill Hulbert6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Tina Jaquess vs Judith Davis / Siobhan Powell6-0, 6-1
2021-04-08vs Longshore Lake - MacWilliamsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTina Jaquess / Victoria Pollock vs Jean McKinney / Lisa Osborne7-6, 6-1
2021-04-07vs Pelican Bay North - J. HowardLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Eileen Komanecky vs Dawn Cyr / Beverly Biltz4-6, 4-6
2021-03-24vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 01
L#3 DoublesVictoria Pollock / Tina Jaquess vs Nicki Sebold / Jennifer Dauvergne3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Fiona Prentice
published 4
3.33
Eileen Komanecky
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Denise Reilly
published 3.5
3.25
Tina Jaquess
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Victoria Pollock
published
3.08
Rejeanne Desrosiers
published
Katie Neuman
published
Kimberly Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Jaquess + Victoria Pollock3447% games−6.9% vs expected
Tina Jaquess + Cheryl Rauch3347% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Komanecky + Cheryl Rauch3255% gamesnot enough data
Tina Jaquess + Eileen Komanecky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Fiona Prentice
33W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Eileen Komanecky
70W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Denise Reilly
54W–37L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Tina Jaquess
105W–80L career · 9 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
Rejeanne Desrosiers
43W–54L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Elizabeth Navarre Paladino
4W–14L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Katie Neuman
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberly Taylor
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.