Teams

Talis Park - Hurt-Simmons

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-26vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Linda Conners vs Dana Sacks / Lisa Campbell4-6, 4-6
2021-05-24vs Verona Walk - LeeLost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Linda Conners vs Jeanette Thevening / Susanna Haedelt0-6, 3-6
2021-05-19vs Quail West - CorteseLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Linda Koenig vs Christine Kriss / Marie Zinno6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Nada Uzelac vs Ashley Hayes / Linda Hayes2-6, 3-6
2021-05-05vs Treviso Bay - PollockLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Thomas / Claudia Hammon vs Cheryl Rauch / Eileen Komanecky3-6, 5-7
2021-04-21vs Pelican Bay North - J. HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Julie Oberweis vs Rita Chimel / Judi Howard4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-04-07vs Longshore Lake - MacWilliamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Ganzhorn / Claudia Hammon vs Darlene Carpenter / Ann Kremer3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Nada Uzelac
published
3.26
Andrea Maatallah
published 3.5
3.26
Linda Koenig
published
3.25
Cheryl Comes
published 3.5
Gail Sousa
published 3.5
3.18
2.94
Claudia Hammon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Glenna Haas
published 3
Julie Oberweis
published
Patricia Buonaiuto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Maatallah + Barbara Hurt-Simmons134 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Comes + Barbara Hurt-Simmons314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nada Uzelac
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Maatallah
13W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Linda Koenig
51W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Comes
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gail Sousa
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Hurt-Simmons
11W–15L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claudia Hammon
80W–104L career · type A · 7 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Glenna Haas
18W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Oberweis
16W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Buonaiuto
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.