Teams

Verona Walk - Lee

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-05-26vs Treviso Bay - PollockWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Susanna Haedelt vs Kimberly Taylor / Cheryl Rauch4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-24vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Susanna Haedelt vs Claudia Hammon / Linda Conners6-0, 6-3
2021-05-19vs GreyHawk - L. KranitesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Teri Williams vs Linda Orlich / Judith Davis6-2, 6-1
2021-05-12vs COLLIER - Quail Creek - J. BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Gail Clark vs Kelly Stein / Eileen Valerio2-6, 0-6
2021-05-05vs Pelican Bay North - J. HowardLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Cheryl Planck vs Dawn Cyr / Beverly Biltz3-6, 3-6
2021-05-02vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusanna Haedelt / Jeanette Thevening vs Susie Beaudet / Aggie Rupert6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-28vs Longshore Lake - MacWilliamsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Cheryl Planck vs Rebecca Gutschow / Linda King6-1, 6-2
2021-04-14vs Olde Cypress - LoomisWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebra O'Donnell / Jeanette Thevening vs Flora Loomis / Cindy Killian6-1, 6-4
2021-04-08vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusanna Haedelt / Jeanette Thevening vs Cheryl Solimine / Bridget Smagala4-6, 3-6
2021-03-31vs Marco YMCA - BurschWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Heidi Crann vs Dana Sacks / Patti Ramer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-24vs Quail West - CorteseLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeidi Crann / Jeanette Thevening vs Kim Swope Schott / Marie Zinno6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Susanna Haedelt
published 4
3.30
Jeanette Thevening
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.19
Cheryl Planck
published
Maria Riccio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanette Thevening + Susanna Haedelt10364% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susanna Haedelt
180W–81L career · no lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
4.04
3.5
Jeanette Thevening
144W–70L career · 11 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elaine Leffingwell-King
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
Cheryl Planck
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.