Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Peltzer & Bulls

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-05vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/CremaWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Kouwabunpat / Elizabeth Kuhle vs Colleen Scanlon / Kirsten Fatland7-5, 6-3
2025-02-08vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/CremaLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Solomon / Mary Gustafson vs Shannon Schuld-Gray / Laura Steenstra3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Bowen / Jan Bulls vs Carole Myser / Erika Tidd4-6, 4-6
2025-02-01vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/CremaLost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Peltzer / Mary Gustafson vs Andrea Gillis / Ashley Maxwell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-18vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/CremaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Gustafson / Julie David vs Cristin Leverte / Andrea Gillis2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Kuhle vs Ashley Matkin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrea Bowen / Brenda Williams vs Kirsten Fatland / Colleen Scanlon4-6, 5-7
2025-01-11vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/CremaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kuhle / Anne Kerwin-Payne vs Cristin Leverte / Darlene Gallego2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Solomon / Mary Gustafson vs Andrea Gillis / Laura Steenstra3-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kim Kouwabunpat
published
4.22
Mary Gustafson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.07
Elizabeth Kuhle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.00
Andrea Bowen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Gail Warden
published
Jane Solomon
published
Margaret Shepp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Warden + Margaret Shepp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Kouwabunpat
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
Mary Gustafson
44W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Elizabeth Kuhle
77W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Andrea Bowen
25W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
Gail Warden
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Solomon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Shepp
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.