Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Day

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W PM

17 players · average NTRP 3.32 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-09-23vs RISE AC-Mower/LongsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElaine Day / Megan Reardon vs Lisa Cannon / Amy Rosevear3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Harman / Rikke Phinney vs Nicole Leatham / Danna Miller6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElaine Day / Janine Nemelka vs Cecia Croft / Catherine Peterson4-6, 2-6
2023-08-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesMolly Adams / Shannon Halverson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Reardon / Collette Renstrom vs Becky Hall / Hannah Lee5-7, 2-6
2023-08-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/EwingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Wilson / Janine Nemelka vs Lisa Ewing / LaNece Andreason6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCollette Renstrom / Rebecca Harman vs Janis Turley / Kristen Treanor3-6, 2-6
2023-07-26vs Liberty Park Tennis-Smith/ByingtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Harman / Shannon Halverson vs Alexis Smith / Laura Nunnelly1-6, 1-6
2023-07-19Split 11
L#1 DoublesJanine Nemelka / Emilee Hurley vs Claudine Finlay / Jennifer Sampson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Reardon / Collette Renstrom vs Alison Pearce / Lora Lyon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMolly Adams / Janine Nemelka vs Nancy Sparrer / Kirsten Lewis6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCollette Renstrom / Shannon Halverson vs Sharon Larkin / Leslie Crandall6-2, 6-4
2023-06-21Split 11
L#1 DoublesSherston Faux / Janine Nemelka vs Kelly Webster / Malisa Bowen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShannon Halverson vs Manal Hall7-5, 6-4
2023-06-14vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/EwingWon 20
W#2 DoublesJanine Nemelka / Molly Adams vs Ann Trentman / Shelly Kemp6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBessy Nielson / Megan Reardon vs Alison Beesley / Lili Leiataua Iosefa6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Emilee Hurley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.34
Bessy Nielson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.24
Megan Reardon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Collette Renstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Janine Sholeff
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.16
Betty Peterson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Diane Poole
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.97
Sherston Faux
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Rikke Phinney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Lori Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.86
Shannon Halverson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Elaine Day
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Molly Adams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nicole Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bessy Nielson + Collette Renstrom4257% games+9.7% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Molly Adams8453% games+8.9% vs expected
Lori Wilson + Rebecca Harman41641% games+1.8% vs expected
Diane Poole + Molly Adams4156% games+0.9% vs expected
Shannon Halverson + Collette Renstrom6641% games−1.5% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Shannon Halverson2448% games−1.7% vs expected
Elaine Day + Molly Adams0737% games−2.4% vs expected
Diane Poole + Rebecca Harman9850% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emilee Hurley
95W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Megan Reardon
40W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Collette Renstrom
61W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Janine Sholeff
101W–95L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Betty Peterson
257W–369L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Diane Poole
191W–163L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Sherston Faux
88W–157L career · 8 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Rikke Phinney
45W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Lori Wilson
70W–154L career · 9 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Shannon Halverson
25W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.86
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · 13 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Elaine Day
123W–244L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 4 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.42
Molly Adams
101W–77L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Fisher
100W–62L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.