Teams

GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Ricks/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesClaire Brandon / Teresa Nevarez vs Jennifer Viramontes / Catherine Nicholson Parker6-7, 3-6
2026-07-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDolly Ricks / Teresa Nevarez vs Patricia Dalbin / Rossana Roacho2-6, 0-5
2026-07-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesClaire Brandon / Teresa Nevarez vs Shirley Cervantes / Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLourdes Livingston / Teresa Nevarez vs Angelina Colquitt / Lucy Pfirman5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Claire Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.82
Ada Castro
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.67
Cristina da Costa
usually #2 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3
Dolly Ricks
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Donna Gray
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Ellen Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Guadalupe Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Lorena Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Lori DeLisser
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Lourdes Livingston
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lourdes Romero
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
MariCruz Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sonia Rangel
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Teresa Nevarez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vanessa White
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Wendy Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lourdes Livingston + Ellen Hughes8648% games+7.1% vs expected
Guadalupe Saenz + Dolly Ricks5451% games+1.6% vs expected
Lorena Chavez + Wendy Ramirez7548% games−2.3% vs expected
Dolly Ricks + Teresa Nevarez131053% games−2.5% vs expected
Wendy Ramirez + Lourdes Romero7546% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Ramirez + Sonia Rangel4847% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Chavez + Lourdes Romero11041% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Chavez + Sonia Rangel4743% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Brandon
36W–46L career · 23 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Ada Castro
35W–36L career · 24 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Cristina da Costa
67W–91L career · 24 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Dolly Ricks
60W–73L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Donna Gray
45W–48L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ellen Hughes
74W–86L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Guadalupe Saenz
71W–59L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorena Chavez
52W–62L career · 34 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori DeLisser
94W–74L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lourdes Livingston
45W–70L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lourdes Romero
34W–52L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
MariCruz Delgado
28W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sonia Rangel
32W–70L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Nevarez
50W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vanessa White
11W–32L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Ramirez
41W–39L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.