← Search

Jackie Wolf

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 15W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith Mowry
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Kempsell
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celestine Donnelly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 35.3% of games
7.0
24.4%
10W–31L · 41.5% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams