← Search

Stephanie Tonin

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 160W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Tonin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history255 matches
W
Joelle Staley / Tessa Staley
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Kimberly Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Christina Eischeid championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Eischeid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Korb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Kimberly Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Christina Eischeid championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brook Vietor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.2% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games
4.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 65.7% of games
4.5
70.8%
68W–28L · 59.3% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 62.9% of games
8.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 53.6% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
37 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova