← Search

Alessandra Nolan

Cedar Hills, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 95W–61L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Alessandra Nolan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Casey Pickett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marci Seegmiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Kimberly Clawson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Rawstorne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mithona Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-01 · SunPro-Allen/Seegmiller · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Johanna Warr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · with Adrienne Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-10 · Eccles- Third Set Squad · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Quinn Pritchett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-06 · SunPro-Allen/Seegmiller · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Rawstorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Leikin/Andrade · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Rawstorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.9% of games
4.0
76.1%
35W–11L · 61.6% of games
4.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 53% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 20% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.3% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 50.4% of games
8.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 59.3% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
30 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert