← Search

Gregg Gammon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.5M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
32 matches · 10W–22L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history32 matches
W
2026-02-08 · 19 Westwood - Racelis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-1
W
2026-01-18 · 19 Westwood - Racelis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-2
W
2026-01-03 · 19 Westwood - Racelis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-23 · 10 Westwood Racelis 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Britta Petersson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-23 · 10 Westwood Racelis 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-01-26 · 10 Westwood Racelis 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Britta Petersson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-01-04 · 10 Westwood Racelis 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanDee Gammon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-08-09 · 2 Westwood Highfill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allen Whitaker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-08-04 · 2 Westwood Highfill · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Racelis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2022-06-30 · 2 Westwood Highfill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Wayland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-06-08 · Westwood Niemeier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Carrell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-18 · Westwood Niemeier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Herring Jr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
7.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–12L · 31.9% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert