Jeff Shifflett
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mechanicsville, VA
74 matches · 46W–28L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history74 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2025
Burkwood Golden
4 Burkwood Stewart
4 Burkwood Stewart
Burkwood Stewart
B11 Burkwood Carter
B2 Burkwood McKelvey
B6 Burkwood Harvey
BURK-Butterworth
A1 Burkwood McKelvey
BURK-Butterworth
C8 Burkwood Carter
3 Burkwood Shifflett
B7 Burkwood Shifflett
B9 Burkwood Shifflett
BURK-Clark
BURK-Shifflett
Hanover Lakes Loyalists
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.9% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 57% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 60.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 51.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.