← Search

Barbara Forsberg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rio Verde, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 5W–7L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history12 matches
L
2024-07-11 · Northern/Thies/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Boyce
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-06-27 · Northern/Thies/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Harriage
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-20 · Northern/Thies/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Harriage
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-13 · Northern/Thies/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Harriage
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-06-06 · Northern/Thies/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Harriage
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-10-13 · 7.0 GEP Golden Hits W65F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Pickett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2021-12-09 · 7.0 GEP HallWerz W65F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with SuLan Peebles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2021-11-04 · 7.0 GEP HallWerz W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2021-10-21 · 7.0 GEP HallWerz W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2018-12-06 · Rothe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Niles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2018-10-18 · Rothe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rothe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2018-10-11 · Rothe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.3% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer