← Search

David Roberts

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 24W–14L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history38 matches
L
2026-02-04 · T Bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dick Fikes
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-11 · T Bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Brown
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-03-23 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-03-02 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Essenburg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-02-23 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dick Fikes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-02-16 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dick Fikes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-02-09 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Foster
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-01-26 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dean McSherry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-05-03 · T bar M/LeVecchio-Fikes M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Myrin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Essenburg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Essenburg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Essenburg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.1% of games
8.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 56.4% of games
9.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova