← Search

Randy Essenburg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 39W–20L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history59 matches
W
Default
2026-02-22 · T Bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Nicoud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-18 · T Bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roderick Burns
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-03-02 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-02-23 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Bracken
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-02 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Petty
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-05-10 · T bar M/LeVecchio-Fikes M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Wilson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-04-07 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Foster
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-03-03 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-02-25 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-02-23 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Wilson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-02-04 · T bar M/Anderson M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-05-19 · T bar M/LeVecchio-Fikes M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Wilson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 57.4% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer