← Search

Debra Berry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Chesterfield, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 1W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history17 matches
L
2026-06-15 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Jordan
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-18 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betty Snavely
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-21 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betty Snavely
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-14 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Goodreau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-03 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betty Snavely
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-27 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betty Snavely
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-06 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Grattan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2021-08-02 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Grattan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-07-19 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Goodreau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-14 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Shives
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-06-07 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Falk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2021-05-28 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Metcalf
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
5.9%
1W–16L · 26.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 94% of the time
#3 Doubles
94%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal