← Search

Ann Falk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 13W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history62 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Burns
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · 10 Stonehenge Bull · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Walsh
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · 10 Stonehenge Bull · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Estes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Goodreau
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · 10 Stonehenge Bull · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Walsh
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-06 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Burns
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-25 · 10 Stonehenge Bull · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Walsh
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Shives
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · 10 Stonehenge Bull · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Estes
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · 10 Stonehenge Bull · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Estes
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-18 · Stonehenge Snavely · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-04 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.9% of games
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 38% of games
4.0
0%
0W–10L · 31% of games
7.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe