← Search

Susan Burns

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 18W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history58 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Falk
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Bull
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-06 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Falk
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · Stonehenge Snavely · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Bull
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-15 · Stonehenge Snavely · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Bull
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · SCC (39 and holding) Lane Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Cacciotti
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-08 · SCC (39 and holding) Lane Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Pulsifer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · SCC (39 and holding) Lane Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Cacciotti
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-18 · Stonehenge Snavely · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Falk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-11 · Stonehenge Snavely · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Bull
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-04 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Falk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-28 · Stonehenge Snavely · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Falk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.1% of games
4.0
20%
4W–16L · 36.3% of games
7.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe