← Search

Victoria Jordan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Chesterfield, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 14W–32L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history46 matches
L
2026-08-05 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betsy Goodreau
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Rohman
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-27 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Goodreau
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Rohman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Blackwood
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Rohman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betsy Goodreau
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-24 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betsy Goodreau
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Hawks
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Stonehenge Snavely · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Berry
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-20 · 5 Stonehenge - Jordan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Hawks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-13 · 5 Stonehenge - Jordan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Hawks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
35.9%
14W–25L · 42.7% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 11.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe