← Search

Mary Blackwood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Chesterfield, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 10W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history34 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Jordan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Blemker
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Rohman
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-13 · 5 Stonehenge - Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karyn Buckley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-08-11 · 5 Stonehenge - Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Rohman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-30 · 5 Stonehenge - Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karyn Buckley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-09 · 5 Stonehenge - Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Blemker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-14 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Rohman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-07-24 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Rohman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-10 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Tucker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-03 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karyn Buckley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-12 · Stonehenge Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Virginia Sargeant
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
29.4%
10W–24L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 59% of the time
#2 Doubles
59%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams