← Search

Nancy Tucker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 2W–15L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history17 matches
W
2026-06-06 · ACAC Rountree/Eavey · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alla Lerner-Brandon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · ACAC Rountree/Eavey · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dianna Gettas
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-07-31 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Cogbill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-10 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Blackwood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-03 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Blemker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-19 · E Stonehenge - Linda Hauserman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karyn Buckley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-6
L
2023-07-26 · Stonehenge Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Cogbill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-28 · Stonehenge Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Cogbill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-25 · Stonehenge Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Jordan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-14 · Stonehenge Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hauserman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2022-08-10 · Stonehenge Jordan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karyn Buckley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-08-03 · Stonehenge Jordan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Virginia Sargeant
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0%
0W–15L · 17.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 71% of the time
#3 Doubles
71%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal