Search

Dundeana Doyle

PALM DESERT, CA
0.0 year-end
69 matches · 34W–35L · seasons 20192023
Where Dundeana sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Dundeana is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dundeana has been a steady 4.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Dundeana has gone from the 83rd to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 59.5% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.1% of games
9.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
Stacey McCoy / Roseann Harris
2023-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Bowen
0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Tricia Hanley / Anne Medzegian
2023-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Bowen
+0.018about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Heather Tucker / Kristin Smith
2023-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Diana Almy
+0.059better than expected — took 56% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Sherrell Sutherland / Karen Ames
2023-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tricia Hanley
0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Christy Foreman / Mary Sotochamps
2022-05-15 · #2 Doubles · with April Boney
0.066below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Lajla Feichter / Tracy Harrischamps
2022-05-14 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke Shapter
0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Elyse Rabinowitz / Gail Warden
2022-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jane Solomon
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
N/A
2022-01-29 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.083about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Valerie Brown / Patrice Meepos
2022-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with April Boney
+0.047better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Vickki Schlappi / Brenda Williams
2022-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Gustafson
+0.024better than expected — took 46% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2021-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sheri Bennett
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Yuka Kimura
0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.