Search

Diana Almy

Vancouver, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
88 matches · 50W–38L · seasons 20192025
Where Diana sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Diana is one of 423 women at 4.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.5 account for 98% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams55 teams · 2014–2025
CV-Indian Ridge CC/Morin
2025 Scta Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.5/4.0/3.5
2025
CV-Mission Hills/Ringer
2025 Scta Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Women 9.0
2025
CGM-Borchers/Rey
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women
2024
VTC-Chiu
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2024
CV-Indian Wells TG/Fleming & Bulls
2023 Usta Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 9.0
2023
N OR-VTC-Chiu
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Diana has been 4.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.5201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Diana has gone from the 98th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 62% of games
4.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 41.5% of games
8.0
75%
12W–4L · 56% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history88 matches
L
Linda Fleiderman / Vickki Schlappi
2025-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gay Hart
+0.034better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Schuld-Gray
0.056below expectation — took 37% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Linda Fleiderman / Vickki Schlappi
2025-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Donna Ringer
0.049below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Linda Fleiderman / Brenda Williams
2025-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patrice Duffy
+0.048better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Yoko Anderson / Debbie Gerlackchamps
2023-11-03 · #2 Doubles · with Cynthia Reyes
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-10-08 · CGM-Borchers/Rey · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Sather
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-10-08 · VTC-Chiu · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Pickering
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-25 · #2 Doubles · with Tina Clancy
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-06-24 · #2 Doubles · with Tina Clancy
0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Sheryl Fewkes / Leslie Hofferdchamps
2023-06-23 · #2 Doubles · with Tina Clancy
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-06-23 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Pickering
+0.044better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Maria Crema / Ria Lepage
2023-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Bowen
+0.010about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.