← Search

Martha Yates

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lolo, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 9W–11L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history20 matches
L
2025-07-24 · 8.0 Team · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Torgerson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · 8.0 Team · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Torgerson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-18 · 8.0 Team · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Lentz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-08-01 · Fried Legs · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami DeGrosky
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-07-31 · Fried Legs · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami DeGrosky
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-07-31 · Fried Legs · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Moffatt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-07-08 · Fried Legs · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Moffatt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-08-24 · Vintage Pearls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Geiszler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-08-22 · Vintage Pearls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Geiszler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2022-07-26 · Really Old Pearls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Geiszler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-07-26 · Really Old Pearls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Geiszler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-25 · Really Old Pearls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
45%
9W–11L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe