← Search

Cynthia Feike

Wailuku, HI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 88W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Feike to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
Susan Webber / Michelle Smith
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Luanne Apo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Ruby Matsui championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Ruby Matsui championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · #3 Doubles · with Ruby Matsui championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-5
L
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · with Ruby Matsui championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-8
W
2026-05-24 · #4 Doubles · with Ruby Matsui championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-1
W
2026-05-16 · Wahine Slama Jama · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruby Matsui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · Wahine Slama Jama · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Luanne Apo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · Wahine Slama Jama · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruby Matsui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
M Beverly Rivers / Janet Deandre
2026-02-21 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Sawyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-31 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruby Matsui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mona Decrinis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
65%
26W–14L · 55.3% of games
8.0
68%
17W–8L · 58.1% of games
9.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 54% of games
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
9 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer