← Search

Linda Berghoff

Olympia, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 75W–141L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Linda Berghoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-09-12 · VAC-Berghoff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Baldwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · GTC-Ohagan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · GTC-Chan-Flying Eagles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with DAVID BENSON mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · GTC-Ohagan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-10 · GTC-Chan-Flying Eagles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Lockett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · GTC-Ohagan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-23 · Chan-Flying Eagles · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicki Moll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-18 · Chan-Flying Eagles · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-15 · GTC-Chan-Flying Eagles · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · GTC-Chan-Flying Eagles · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with KuiCha Davison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-06 · GTC-Chan-Flying Eagles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-5
L
2026-02-17 · Chan-Flying Eagles · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicki Moll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
40.8%
29W–42L · 46.5% of games
4.5
17.4%
4W–19L · 33.8% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 45% of games
8.0
66.7%
30W–15L · 53.4% of games
9.0
13%
3W–20L · 38.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 38.1% of games
8.0mixed
5.6%
1W–17L · 33.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
60 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams