← Search

Nancy McPhee

University Pl, WA
0.0 year-end
46 matches · 18W–28L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Nancy sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Nancy is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nancy has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Nancy has gone from the 48th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 43.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.6% of games
7.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 46.1% of games
8.0
0%
0W–8L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
W
Michele Capestany / Kristen Taylor
2023-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherri Woolworth
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-11-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Corinne Collie
−0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-10-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherri Woolworth
−0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-10-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherri Woolworth
+0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-09-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Peters
−0.063below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peters
−0.057below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peters
+0.024better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Janie Daray / Sandy Howard
2023-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doreen Gavin
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Woolworth
−0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peters
−0.057below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Laura Seaman / Kay Hrdina
2023-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peters
+0.008better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2023-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peters
+0.041better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.