← Search

Angi Bradley

TUMWATER, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 68W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angi Bradley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-02-28 · SWW-LRC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anneke Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · SWW-LRC-Hudson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Moll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-18 · SWW-LRC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Brinkhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-11 · SWW-LRC-Hudson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Moll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-15 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-01 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Victor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-31 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-03-23 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Brinkhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-03-09 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Moll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-02-22 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-02-15 · SPR-Berry-Sprinker/Gorin 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Sevey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-25 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Rosenbloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.9% of games
3.5
61.2%
30W–19L · 56.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#1 Singles
13%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams