← Search

Mary Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
3.5A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
43 matches · 14W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Cerhan championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Cerhan championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Kruse championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Cerhan
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Peterson
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jodi Kruse
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Colby
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Palen
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Wildfeuer
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-0
W
2026-06-17 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Colby
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Teske
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Palen
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.3% of games
4.0
13.6%
3W–19L · 38.4% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 53.4% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert