← Search

John Phillips

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 81W–62L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history143 matches
W
2026-10-17 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Kranick
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Friday
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-19 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Kalafut
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Hunters Green Falcons/ D. Beckwith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catalina Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-6
L
2026-06-07 · Hunters Green Falcons/ D. Beckwith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danna Sturman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Carr
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-10 · Hunters Green Falcons/ D. Beckwith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Nivens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-08 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Kalafut
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Carr
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Carr
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · Hunters Green Falcons/ D. Beckwith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danna Sturman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-14 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Cotey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
54.7%
35W–29L · 52.3% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.6% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.8% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.7% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.7% of games
7.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer