← Search

Philip Kalafut

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 53W–97L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history150 matches
L
2026-10-17 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Antonio Correa
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-19 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Phillips
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · Hunters Green Fees/Warren · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dwight Ford
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · Hunters Green Fees/Warren · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dwight Ford
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Livingston
loading the estimate
1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Carr
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-08 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Phillips
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Warren
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Johnson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Kranick
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Randrianarison
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Friday
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
45.1%
41W–50L · 49.2% of games
4.0
32%
8W–17L · 41.8% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 28.8% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.4% of games
7.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 29.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams