← Search

Walter Norwood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wesley Chapel, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 101W–79L · seasons 2015–2026
Match history180 matches
W
2026-05-16 · Temple Terrace / Jenkins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max R Francois
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · Temple Terrace / Jenkins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Rairigh
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-02 · Temple Terrace / Jenkins · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Burkhart
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-29 · Temple Terrace / Jenkins · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · Temple Terrace / Jenkins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max R Francois
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-11 · Temple Terrace / Jenkins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Rairigh
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · Temple Terrace Bulls - S. Jenkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Chen
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-07 · Temple Terrace Bulls - S. Jenkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Max R Francois
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · Temple Terrace Bulls - S. Jenkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Rairigh
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · Temple Terrace Bulls - S. Jenkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Burkhart
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-17 · Temple Terrace Bulls - S. Jenkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Rairigh
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-22 · HCC - K. Chin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mony Rodon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
54.2%
52W–44L · 52% of games
7.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 53% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.3%
19W–12L · 54.9% of games
7.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#2 Singles
10%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer