← Search

Sean Friday

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 82W–91L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history173 matches
W
2026-10-10 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Phillips
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-03 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Johnson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · Hunters Green Hunt for Green October/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Warren
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · Hunters Green Fees/Warren · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Philbin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · Hunters Green Fees/Warren · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diego Perez
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · HILLS/Cotey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janene Culumber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · HILLS/Cotey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danna Sturman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-09 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Johnson
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-25 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Baker
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · HILLS/Cotey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fan Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-21 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ian Zhang
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
39.5%
30W–46L · 47.1% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.2% of games
7.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
28W–20L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
39 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe