← Search

Vincent La Cava

Yarrow Point, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
140 matches · 98W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
311 of 782

Vincent is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Vincent has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0201920202021202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Vincent has gone from the 75th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 54% of games
8.0
76.4%
42W–13L · 57.5% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Wachter
+0.011better than expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Wachter
+0.010about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Popplewell
−0.073below expectation — took 37% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Sennett
−0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · with Douglas Verdieck
+0.043better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Douglas Verdieck
−0.008about as expected — took 45% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Robert Schefter / Richard Lozanochamps
2025-09-12 · #3 Doubles · with John Hynes
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Peter Finkle / William Wellschamps
2025-09-11 · #2 Doubles · with Douglas Verdieck
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Mick Horton / Erik Lorenz
2025-09-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Sennett
−0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
−0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bart Fite
−0.021below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Douglas Denney / Walt Paulson
2025-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bart Fite
+0.023better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.