← Search

Linda Winn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 6W–12L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history18 matches
L
2026-03-20 · Su.Greer55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Heller
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-06 · Su.Greer55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Harris
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-18 · Su.Greer55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Matthews
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-04-17 · Su.Greer55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Matthews
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-14 · Su.Greer55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Talton
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-28 · Su.Greer55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Brawner
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-05-03 · Su.Greer55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Procter
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-03-15 · Su.Greer55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Talton
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-07-12 · Lo.Hatlen55M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Winn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-29 · Lo.Hatlen55M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Winn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-08 · Re.Procter65M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Winn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2022-07-28 · beckyprocter65 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Winn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.9% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal