← Search

Carrie Pelz

TUALATIN, OR
0.0 year-end
29 matches · 11W–18L · seasons 2019–2020
Where Carrie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Carrie is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carrie has been a steady 4.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games
4.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 53.4% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history29 matches
L
Sallie Katter / Kasey Williams
2020-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Redding
+0.028better than expected — took 45% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2020-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Borchers
+0.020better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2019-12-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jorge Fuenmayor
−0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Amy Juppenlatz Sweet / Max Mooneymixed
2019-11-03 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jorge Fuenmayor
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/Amixed
2019-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jorge Fuenmayor
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Jackie Dooris / Charles Gatesmixed
2019-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Yuya Fujii
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Sharon Tuemmler / Sarah Tuemmlerchamps
2019-09-28 · #1 Doubles · with Stacy Webster
−0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Maureen Harwood / Cathi Peckchamps
2019-08-18 · #1 Doubles · with Stacy Webster
−0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Candi Kleiva / Sydney Taggart
2019-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra van Hoy
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Sydney Taggart / Candi Kleiva
2019-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra van Hoy
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Bo Yu / Boon Yon Joung
2019-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Redding
+0.015better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2019-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Redding
−0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.