Search

Stacy Webster

Beaverton, OR
4.5C year-end 2024
34 matches · 14W–20L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
27%
down to 4.0
73%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 16% down · 84% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.08. Higher than today’s 4.05 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 4.5
8 of 19
OR · 4.5
134 of 226

Stacy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams39 teams · 2013–2027
WHRC-Leong
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2027
LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
WHRC-Donato/Lautenbach
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2026
WHRC-Olander/Anderson
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women
2024
Webster/Townsend
2024 One Doubles · 4.5 Women
2024
N OR-Webster
2023 One Doubles · 4.5 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacy has been 4.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.5201920212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2023, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Stacy has gone from the 87th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
50%
12W–12L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-06-06 · WHRC-Donato/Lautenbach · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Cuenco
0.018below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · WHRC-Donato/Lautenbach · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Merrick
0.027below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · WHRC-Donato/Lautenbach · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Merrick
0.015about as expected — took 65% of games against 66% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Hagelgans
0.060below expectation — took 47% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · LOTC-Mendenhall/Green-Zwemke · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Green-Zwemke
0.080below expectation — took 8% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-08-17 · WHRC-Olander/Anderson · #1 Doubles · with Sue Gregoire
+0.007below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-06-23 · Webster/Townsend · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Nicole Partch
0.018about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Amy Wang / Lisa Handley
2024-03-02 · WHRC-Olander/Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sue Gregoire
+0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-02-03 · WHRC-Olander/Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerstin Anderson
0.036below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-07-13 · N OR-Webster · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sue Gregoire
+0.028better than expected — took 43% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2022-09-17 · WHRC-Donato/Cronk · #1 Doubles · with Emily Townsend
0.046below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-09-17 · WHRC-Donato/Cronk · #1 Doubles · with Emily Townsend
+0.033better than expected — took 43% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.