← Search

Emily Townsend

BEAVERTON, OR
4.5C year-end 2024
75 matches · 44W–31L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Emily sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Emily is one of 423 women at 4.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.5 account for 98% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 5.0, 4.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

4.04.55.020192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Emily has gone from the 84th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 61.5% of games
5.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.1% of games
9.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
W
2024-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cindy Nordlund
+0.064better than expected — took 86% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cindy Nordlund
+0.017better than expected — took 58% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirsten Barnes
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
N/Amixed
2024-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Jay
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Jay
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2023-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eugene Jung
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Jay
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2023-10-14 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eugene Jung
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-09-23 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Jay
+0.000below expectation — took 56% of games against 76% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2023-08-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathrine Olander
−0.074about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2023-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathrine Olander
−0.106about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-05-21 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.056better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.