Search

Geralyn Peterson

Puyallup, WA
0.0 year-end
43 matches · 16W–27L · seasons 20192022
Where Geralyn sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Geralyn is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Geralyn has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 57.6% of games
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 43.9% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.4% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
W
2021-12-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Compton
0.009about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
Mary Snow / Sandy Howard
2021-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Herron
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2021-11-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Hebert
0.074below expectation — took 20% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Diana Chan / Lee Ann Strueby
2021-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Hebert
0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2020-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Moblo
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Irene Schade
2020-02-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.036better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2020-02-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 27% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Libbie McClaflin / Michele Jorgenson
2019-08-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Forbes
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Kathy Walker / Kay Mamiyachamps
2019-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Cook
0.031below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2019-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Hornsby
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2019-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Ellis
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2019-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Ellis
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.